Archive for the ‘Folk Culture’ Category

#392 – I’ll Sing the Song When You’re Gone

Monday, May 31st, 2010

sam amidon’s digital folklorica.

The opening chord sequence of “Sugar Baby,” the first song on Sam Amidon’s album of traditional American folk songs, All Is Well, announces that this record is up to something other than merely replicating Appalachian tunes. No Songcatcher here. Instead, the chord’s suspended bass notes and more darkly-hued, cosmopolitan, almost bossa nova-ish harmonies place the listener one step removed from the original setting, as if we were listening to coal-streaked, boney fingers frailing silver-banjo strings while sitting in a space-age bachelor pad (or better said a Dwell magazine loft studio in Williamsburg, Brooklyn) instead of on a mountain cabin porch.

That is to say, the music acknowledges, even celebrates its inauthenticity. But it does so by sonically signaling a relocation and displacement of one era’s folk music to another context. The old folk lyrics are so capacious, of course, that they make this transit well. Their allegorical dimensions only widen and encompass more in the new setting. No sepia tones in this digital photo album: place names and old, weird Americana jump into the present, pertinent and resonant.

On All Is Well all is not. Horns, strings, and other orchestral textures coat the raw songs in a kind of eerie, haunted soundscape. Reverb and multilayered vocals add to the feeling of hearing music once removed. Moreover, Amidon sings the songs in a kind of flat, affectless, hypnotized daze—it’s a voice that ventriloquizes old mountain singing, but with a hint of self-consciousness about the imitating. Amidon doesn’t want to become a mountain singer himself, but rather, in his timbre and tone, he seems to connect his own deep listening to mountain music to the production of meaning and feeling in the contemporary, sleek, synthesized city. He’s a new kind of New Lost City Rambler.

In one sense, the formula is simpler than all this: Amidon’s album merely sounds like traditional American folk music covered by Sufjan Stevens. But as the music washes over you, there is the feeling that there is more here than meets the ear. Amidon does not tap into the wellspring of American folk music itself, but rather, more intriguingly, spins his listener around on the whirlpool of figuring out exactly what makes folk music folk.

We can always rely on Louis Armstrong’s famous bit of philosophizing on this topic: “All music is folk music—I never heard no horse sing a song.” True enough. But then maybe all music needs to be heard by someone else besides the singer in order to count as music. Which is to say that Amidon’s album connects to a long-running debate about folk music.

The question goes as follows: are vernacular sounds always-already folk music or do they only acquire folkiness after being assigned the category by some outside force, usually a representative of some higher, more supposedly modernized socio-economic class?

The first position imagines that music counts as folk for insiders who may not have even heard of that label. From this perspective, if folk music is made in the forest, and no one is there to hear it except for a small, remote, closed-circle of forest dwellers, then it’s still folk music for this special group of people known as the folk, no matter how they themselves might understand the music.

The second position, by contrast, locates the authenticity of folk music in the ear of the beholder, in this case the outsider, the culture broker, the recorder and adjudicator from on high, who doles out the label of folk where he or she sees fit. From this perspective, folk music and musicians are only created from without. Reception is all. Listening is what imbues music with its folkiness. If it’s played in the forest, and no one from outside overhears it, then it can’t become folk. Musical sound must become reified—heard and situated (and in the process inevitably recast) by an external force—in order to become suffused with the magic of folk’s spell of authenticity.

What is intriguing about Amidon’s album is that it seems to defy these two positions, or rather, it combines them. There are times when the music gets a bit boring and rote—it’s almost too mellow and reserved—but on songs such as “Sugar Daddy,” “Saro,” “Little Satchel,” and “O Death,” the new sonic setting makes the music at once heard at a distance and heard with an immersive, almost overwhelming immediacy. Your perspective, far away, close up, see saws.

For a moment you can’t tell the folk forest from the digital trees, and you get lost where once you were found, and found where once you were lost.

Listen to Sam Amidon’s All Is Well.

#346 – Come Gather Round (the Computer) People

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

of digital public intellectuals, civic engagers, and policy wonks.

(1) Michael Bérubé visited our Engaged Humanities Scholar as Public Intellectual research workshop at Northwestern U in mid-October. He was smart and funny, offering a model of the public intellectual as witty and welcoming to others.

(2) He talked about his new project, The Left at War, which examines intra-progressive intellectual debates about the military responses to 9/11. Michael argues that cultural studies–particularly the legacy of Stuart Hall’s more explicit political examinations of the ideological background in which Thatcherism emerged in 1980s Britain–can help us gain a better sense of how to build a progressive multilateralism in the US and the world (imitating Hall’s famous phrase “Marxism without guarantees,” I’d call Michael’s vision “multilateralism without guarantees”). Michael’s point was to use Stuart Hall’s more political analysis rather than his more famous subcultural studies work in order to critique both the liberal hawk pro-war position, which was easily coopted by the right, and to criticize what Michael calls the “Manichean left,” which assumes that the enemy of my enemy is my friend (even in this case fundamentalist terrorists). Though I want to learn more from the book about how, exactly, cultural studies fits into this new model of progressive internationalism (Ellen Willis figures in the part of the book Michael did not discuss as much during his visit, which can’t be a bad thing!), Michael’s careful effort to think through how ideas and culture relate to the world of politics was captivating.

(3) Michael’s visit, which took place the same weekend as the wonderful conference at U of Iowa called Platforms for Public Scholars, made me think more consciously about the whole concept of the “public intellectual” in our time. I was left thinking about three different models of public intellectual that both overlap and diverge:

  • (a) The classic public intellectual is the heroic (foolhardy?) book reviewer or essayist with a desk copy, a 1000 to 5000 word limit, and a deadline for publication. This is the typical version of the public intellectual in which the world might become the alcoves at CUNY in the 1930s and 40s and we might become all New York Intellectuals sparring in the generalist, non-specialist public sphere of debate and discussion. The digital comes into play here as book reviews and essays give way to blogs and multimedia formats: can a general, broad, inclusive public sphere of intellectual engagement function in this new space? Can it be more democratic and widely participatory than the exclusivity of intellectual life in the world of New York Intellectuals and other cafe intellectual traditions?
  • (b) The Platforms for Public Scholars offered a different model of the public intellectual, what we might call the civic intellectual, a figure who works in radically-democratic, service-based collaboration with members of other communities (youth groups, schools, unions, associations, towns, and the like) on products of knowledge exploration and acquisition. The civic intellectual is not necessarily a generalist, but rather knows how to bring specialized training in a scholarly field to bear on a particular project, and also is open to learning from other, non-academic communities. This model most directly challenges older versions of university-centric scholarship, which is so influenced by its monastic origins. And the digital seems to offer one way by which civic intellectualism might flourish, bringing the university and the world beyond the campus gates together in productive and new ways. *But* this is not quite the same thing as (a) the classic public intellectual. And therein lies a tension concerning the public intellectual and the digital. What is gained, what lost, in the differences between these two models? How might they overlap in useful and worthy ways?
  • (c) Finally, a third kind of public intellectual is the policy wonk. This figure is more closely aligned with government and political parties. He (and often it’s a he, though increasingly less so) tends to think little of culture, and live in a world even more insular than the academic. It’s the institutions of policy wonkery to which Michael Bérubé wants to introduce the tools of cultural studies (though in doing so, he also wants to reshape what culture studies is, moving it away from simplistic pop culture transgression-equals-resistance assumptions to Hall’s more supple explorations of the linkages between culture, ideology, and politics). Unlike the classic public intellectual, the policy wonk is less concerned with maintaining a distance from centers of power. Unlike the civic intellectual, the policy wonk tends to be less concerned with the processes of “democraticizing knowledge” (by and large), and more concerned with actual ends and results through access to power.

(4) So, how might these three kinds of public intellectualism intersect and overlap and diverge? Where does the digital fit? Are there other kinds of public intellectual activity and what should be their relationships to the models above. I think there are great and perhaps even insurmountable differences between the three models above, and I am left thinking about the role of the digital in exacerbating these differences and, also, the potential of the digital to offer tools for reorganizing public intellectual life in new ways. I want to get away from the “digital is democratic, may a 1000 blogs bloom” euphoria. At the same time, I think the digital does offer enormous potential for a sense of quality intellectual engagement and civic belonging beyond both what the book, magazine, newspaper, and cafe could do in days of yore as well as what the campus could do with chalk and chalkboard.

(5) I’m starting to think about how the abstractions above can be applied to particular projects of scholarly inquiry. So as I begin to organize my next research projects, I am pondering how I might move among the three models above while developing a history of folk music festivals, a biography of Paul Goodman, or a history of the 1976 US bicentennial. And I am thinking about how the digital might be applied in this research, and I’m particularly contemplating how one might represent these different sorts of projects in U.S. intellectual and cultural history through digital means.

For instance, how might the participatory and multicultural dimensions of folk music festivals appear digitally? How might not only the analog music of banjos and clogs and slide guitars and accordions, but also the feeling of community and exchange at these festivals, be investigated through digital means? How might Goodman’s multi-genre approaches to public life appear online? How might the reader/viewer/interactor with this material contribute to making meaning out of it? How might I represent the knowledge gleaned from my research so that it can “go viral,” mutate, be used and re-used in new ways?

(7) Thanks again to Michael Bérubé for his enormous energy and generosity of time and spirit during his visit.

X-posted (and revised somewhat) from HASTAC blog.

#343 – Anthology of Polymorphous Perversity

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

when harry (smith) met matthew (barney).

It comes about from legends, Bibles, plagues, and it revolves around vegetables and death. There’s nobody that’s going to kill traditional music. All those songs about roses growing out of people’s brains and lovers who are really geese and swans that turn into angels—they’re not going to die…traditional music is too unreal to die. – Bob Dylan

Harry Smith’s Anthology of American Folk Music is not a dictionary, encyclopedia, or even an anthology; it’s the first installment of Matthew Barney’s Cremaster Cycle.

harry_smith

The alchemy of milk: Harry Smith.

Or, better said, the Cremaster Cycle comprises volumes five through ten of the Anthology of American Folk Music.

Image: Allen Ginsberg.

#330 – Echolocation #17: Darkening the Brightness

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

at first it seems like utterly normal folk-rock, but then frontier ruckus’s “strangeness never ceases.”

fr_img03_hires

Frontier Ruckus, “Mona and Emmy,” Live at Paste Magazine

Frontier Ruckus‘s best song, “Mona and Emmy,” is not on the group’s new album, The Orion Songbook, though there are many good songs on that release. There is, however, a wonderful version of “Mona and Emmy” recorded for Live at Paste Magazine.

“Mona and Emmy” is a parable, but about what? At the Paste Magazine performance, lead singer Matthew Milla says it’s a “childhood love kind of song about this girl who I was childhoodly in love with.” He explains that the girl who he loved was from an evangelical family. When baptized by her father, she was surrounded by a hoard of black flies, which her father took to be a bad omen.

But that seems to only be partly what the song is about. It’s a kind of triangle love story, perhaps, between the singer, Mona, and Emmy. Or is it simply a moment poised between memory and the future, between a childhood love and an adult love? The song is certainly about sins committed and desires unquenchable, pranks gone awry and restlessness wrested into dreams, lost opportunities lost for good, and the renewal of spirit in remembering what’s gone and what still remains.

Most of all, it’s about the feeling of a summer night in a nameless small American town on the edge of the Interstate.

As the story unfolds, the singer is getting off work at the local market, where he works “nine to five around the hiss of the ice box compartment.” He and Mona, who has been buying milk and honey, seek to set the town on fire, but instead there’s just stillness, a wonderful kind of delicious American night stillness. Stirring the weeping willows like a gentle wind, the song’s chords float by, quintessential old-timey-folk-music-by-way-of-Neil-Young chords, as David Jones’s banjo clatters past like a train and trumpet player Zachary Nichols puffs a melody just behind. Anna Burch plays the role of Mona, the singer’s “only friend,” and together they share the memory of Emmy and her baptism and a second memory of the singer jokingly plunging Emmy’s head underwater while swimming one night, causing Emmy’s father to cry.

Wandering through the “neighborhoods from Mona’s house to the interstate,” the singer wants to flee “for railroad tracks in other towns,” but at the same time longs “to hold to something longer, something meaner, something stronger.” He urges Mona to depart with him, setting out on the Interstate to the promised land, but Mona points out that the Interstate dead ends, and together they ask: “Is the promised land just a funny way to say the strangeness never ceases?” At song’s end, Mona and the singer grasp at the memory of Emmy’s religious childhood: “‘Cause Emmy, you have baptized me to pieces.”

With every listen, the story keeps unfolding in a new ways. In fragments, the mystery of the song only expands into the starry sky. And as the singers’ voices blend and separate, as the banjo plucks into and out of the old chords, as the snare drum skip along and snap back, as the trumpet rises and falls on the simple chords, one discovers again—surely, sadly, thankfully, and quite miraculously—that the “strangeness never ceases.”

#320 – The Politics of Folk Music

Tuesday, June 16th, 2009

pondering folk music assemblages.

Why do folk musicians gather at festivals, while old-timey musicians hold conventions?

#311 – Ralph Stanley for President

Saturday, May 16th, 2009

the politics of music revealed.

Franklin Bruno posted an image by Mecca Normal‘s David Lester back in March that, for me, maps out the deep politics of culture. Or maybe the better way of saying it is that it maps out the deep culture of politics.

thepoliticsarenotobviousbydavidlester

Here, politics are “not obvious.” Instead, they are something at once more humble and more profound: they are all about self-expression, the heavens, and the individual in relation to the rest of the world. They are about one person “getting” another person and conveying that communication on paper. They are about a clawhammer style half-mastered, a shadow of blue or gray sketched just right, a hopeful clang of strings, a person sitting in front of another person, the brushing of a banjo, a painting acknowledging the passage of sound.

Politics become about instruments passed across the generations through mass production and consumption, yet reclaimed; instruments turned anti-instrumental. They are about things and sounds and images translated back and forth from bodies to feelings to representations — a circle broken and fixed again, a circle unbroken. They are all very quiet and hushed — “not obvious” — and then you look and the brushed hand begins to roll into a pulsation.

David Lester’s note to Franklin Bruno on the painting:

“The politics are not obvious” is a painting I did that a banjo player bought after seeing it displayed when Mecca Normal played a barber shop in Olympia and a bookshop in Seattle during a west coast tour in 2004. The man later sent me a cassette of his banjo playing. He recorded just this one copy to send to me. This was art. This was political.

Image: David Lester

#292 – The Daily News

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

graphic displays of the everyday.

My work comments on experiences in daily life — through dialogue, humor, mistakes, shapes & spaces, the way people are & constant conversation. — Kelly Lasserre

There remains a vernacular art of the cracks, spaces, and fissures of everyday life, even in the relentless online flow of digital networks and systems. Kelly Lasserre’s homemade prints, which view well online (and were featured on the gold mine of a website, Lost At E Minor), carry vital information from those spaces off the grid.

Initially, Lasserre’s prints appear innocent and playful, like some goofy Dr. Seuss-inspired sweater at a hipster craft fair, but their images and phrases stick with you. They speak in that voice inside one’s head, the one that whispers the truth even when one doesn’t want to hear it, the observation or revelation that is at once coming from somewhere else and welling up from deep within one’s core.

How Lasserre translates this voice into visual form is rather remarkable. Using the iconographies of the folkloric, the handmade, the cutesy, the antique store, the summer camp, she works with off-kilter, simple shapes, uneven, cursive letters, and one-size-does-not-fit-all organizations of the visual field. But these signals and symbols of the relic, the nostalgic, the rustic, the folksy somehow become scathing, wry, sometimes scary, and always uber-contemporary personal and social commentary. It’s as if an organic wax candle dripped with the light of a flourescent glare in an interogation room or the digital beam of a computer screen.

The apparent easy-going innocence and safety of Lasserre’s prints turns out to be haunted by insinuations of unease, intense scrutiny, concern, and vulnerability. This seems particularly the case with issues of gender and sexuality, but it applies to the broader terrain of the everyday that she investigates in her work.

These prints giggle and worry in equal turns. They express exhaustion and exhilaration, relief one moment and alarm the next. They seem filled with love, and also with a kind of gnawing pain. The iconographic form signals authenticity, domesticity, at-homeness, a comfort with the world, but the content communicates alienation and uncertainty.

Lasserre’s prints are most of all about the daily, funny, and often fraught negotiations one makes with other people, things, and activities: with friends, strangers, art-making, skylines, dishes, ice cream cones, animals, letters, language, counting, jealousy, shoes, hats, hoping, worrying, skin, hair, eyes, feet, failure, progress and — most especially — with oneself.

lasserredishes

lasserreavoidingyou

lasserreperspective1

lasserrelegs

hate_your_hands_and_shoes

lasserrebeardedmen

creepyoldmen

lasserrestoptouchingme

Images: Kelly Lasserre website

#280 – Spinning Americana

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

folk voyeurism in a record collector’s ghost world.

You’ve got one week to watch pitchfork.tv’s online presentation of the film Desperate Man Blues, which chronicles the life of 78 rpm collector Joe Bussard.

As with Roger Kappers’ Alan Lomax – The Song Hunter, chronicled in Culture Rover #148, Desperate Man Blues focuses not on old “folk” music itself (or in this case, the 1920s and 30s commercial recordings of folk music), but rather on a collector of that music.

We are listening and watching someone listening and watching.

Just as Kappers chose to film Alan Lomax, incapacitated by a stroke, as a kind of monument to the folk music he obsessively collected, so too Australian director Edward Gillen takes special pleasure in panning up and down Bussard’s lean, pale frame as he expresses the ecstasy of the music collector.

Pulling the sacred shellac from its nondescript paper sleeve, Bussard lovingly places the platters on the turntable; then he bops, toe-taps, air-guitars, tilts back in his chair in glee, gets up from sitting as if lifted by the ghostly force of scratchy sounds from the past, then sits down again, as if he realizes he’s getting carried away. He’s entirely oblivious, absorbed in his pleasures — then he comes to again. It comes across like watching someone fall into a spell, overtaken by the music, spoken to in tongues, then emerging again from another zone.

bussard_narrowweb__200x302

Joe Bussard

The film’s focus on Bussard renders it an appreciation of appreciation, an ode to an ode-maker, the collecting of a collecter. Which is well and good. But this viewer longs for more. Bussard’s dancing, his secret basement musical hideout, his obsessions and revulsions, all hint at deeper emotional and social meanings.

The most powerful scene comes toward the end of the film, when Bussard heads out to an old African-American Virginian man’s house in search of 78s lurking in his basement. The trip only yields records from the 1950s, not what Bussard is looking for. But he takes pleasure in playing some of his musical finds on his truck’s cassette player, so that the African-American man and his friend can listen.

As the three men — two black, one white, all aging but not quite as old as the music to which they are listening — gather around Bussard’s truck speakers, the dynamics of Bussard’s travels across the social hierarchies of race, class, region, and power crackle to the surface, then recede again. There is a connection made among the men as they listen. The music grows on them, and one of the elderly African-American men recalls lyrics to an old blues song, summoning to his throat and body age-old traditions of the black vernacular.

As Bussard departs the house, the camera lingers for a moment, as if wanting to stay with the African-American men and tell their story, the story not of music crossing over from a lost world to a collector’s trove of buried treasure, but of a living tradition, one fading, shifting, rearranging, mouldering, sprouting again from generation to generation: the echo turned back into a shout.

But that’s not what Desperate Man Blues set out to do. We return from the African-American men to Bussard’s own odd odyssey, the story of someone fleeing from the present into the past, encountering living souls along the way, but only to get back to his own basement. He drives home, but something is also driving him back to his underground lair.

Yet we never really learn more about what that deeper drive is. We gaze at Bussard, follow him on his record hunts, hear from his fans and admirers, and hang in his basement, but we never really get to the man’s inner life, his deeper emotions. How did and does he make a living? What was his family like? What have been his trials and tribulations?

Everything’s all joyful, whoop ‘em up Cindy foreign appreciation of the odd American bird (who started out collecting birds’ nests before he switched to records). But you sense that there is a bluesier, more earthy, more resonant story lurking in the film: a Ghost World story whose phantoms flicker in the grooves, but never get amplified.

The title Desperate Man Blues hints at something more fascinating and important — perhaps also more painful and difficult — going on with Bussard than merely his quirky, human-interest-story habits. The specter of this other tale haunts the film, a tantalizing record that remains lost in the basement, unspun, up a sleeve, under cover.

#243 – Thinking Inside the Box

Sunday, October 19th, 2008

the leaky beauty of joseph cornell’s mystery cabinets.

Try as you might, you cannot fit the whole world in a box. From this failure comes the heartbreaking power of Joseph Cornell’s art.

One can only navigate the imagination in increments, miniatures, on the wreckage of coffin shards, lost at sea, a filmy soap bubble on the expanse.

Images: Joseph Cornell, Untitled (Soap Bubble Set), 1936; Joseph Cornell with his box “Garbo: The Crystal Mask,” about 1939-1940, Joseph Cornell Study Center, Smithsonian American Art Museum.

#222 – Echolocation #13: High on a Mountaintop

Wednesday, June 18th, 2008

such great heights with roscoe holcomb.

“Roscoe Holcomb has a certain untamed sense of control, which makes him one of the best.” – Bob Dylan

Mountain musician and coal miner Roscoe Holcomb approached his songs as if they were strangers, mysterious shapes in the twilight, visitors from afar, confusing but alluring mirrors to another realm.

It always feels like early morning on An Untamed Sense of Control. Dew drips down a blade of grass. A glint of sun beams around a rocky outcropping. Holcomb’s voice cuts through the uncertain air of floating banjo arpeggios. The music hovers like curls of fog, without precise harmonic location. All is uneven and vertiginous.

We are not down in roots music here, but up in mountain music.

Sure, Holcomb uses songs to dig in, to push along the mule team. But he’s up to something else as well. Music becomes a means of departing, of traveling and soaring into new realms.

He follows the dips and cracks in melodies that emerge like ridge lines on the horizon. Verses and choruses are always a little different each time he traces their forms. His voice discovers unknown edges, ploughs into the clouds, blasts upward, leaves his home behind, reaches back to the forgotten familiar and forward into the future.

Holcomb lifts himself up on what he knows (his voice, his throat, his fingers, his being) to get to what he doesn’t know (which, through the transformative passage of each new song, turns out to be his voice, his throat, his fingers, his being).

Image: John Cohen/Smithsonian Folkways