Archive for February, 2010

#368 – The Idea of the Marketplace, Continued

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

grafton on distinguishing the humanities from the marketplace.

Anthony Grafton weighs in on Louis Menand’s The Marketplace of Ideas:

But thinking about the academy only, or mainly, as a market is another matter. As Menand unwittingly shows, it narrows the field of vision. The humanities need reform because their traditions are confining and their job market is a catastrophe, but reform cannot mean surrender, or dilution. It means finding out how to do what the scientists have already done: how to combine the rigor of tradition with experiment and innovation–but without replacing hordes of underpaid adjuncts with hordes of underpaid post-docs, as the scientists have. More generally, it means finding creative ways to make life instructively hard, for a few years, for the broadest range of talented people of all sorts and conditions whom we can educate and then employ productively and decently. What makes reform urgent is the passion, the erudition, and the intelligence of those whom the academy is now failing–the sheer destruction of talent and love and energy, of the traditions of deep learning, over which we humanists are presiding. The masters of the next generation are still knocking on our doors, but most of them find themselves too busy speeding down the freeway to their next campus, grading stacks of papers, and worrying about their debts to learn as they wish to learn and as we need them to learn. They are missing from Menand’s cool, lucid, and limited book, as they are from so much of what is thought and written about us humanists in these bad days.

From “Humanities and Inhumanities,” New Republic.

#367 – Metered Out

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

the state is dead, long live the state.


#366 – Aggregation Elation

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

digesting bookforum’s omnivore blog.

I remain amazed at the continual flow of articles and links at Bookforum’s Omnivore blog. Its authors remain in the shadows—in fact, they might best be called blog editors instead of authors—but their assemblages are magnificent examples of materials organized in playfully thematic ways.

#365 – Culture Rover’s Unfamiliar Quotations

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

history’s shadowy past.

In spite of worthy, and indeed indispensable, attempts to become different, history, as its clearsighted practitioners are obliged to admit, can never completely divest itself of myth.

- Claude Levi-Strauss

#364 – The Digital Made Flesh

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

koosil-ja/dancekumiko’s algorhythms.

A cyborg is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction. Social reality is lived social relations, our most important political construction, a world-changing fiction. – Donna Haraway, “A Cyborg Manifesto”

Blocks of Continuality/Body, Image, and Algorithm, Koosil-ja/danceKUMIKO‘s multimedia dance performance, explores “the coexistence of the digital and flesh worlds” to dramatize “the potential of a dynamically networked body situated in digital environment.”

At first you are drawn to the screens onstage, trying to grasp how the dancers are “playing” them, but soon this grows frustrating, and you realize that it makes much more sense to watch the dancers themselves, and the ways they are registering the onslaught of images and sounds. But even that starts to lose its centrality. One is ultimately left in a Benjaminian “state of distraction,” lost in the dizzying architecture of the digital network, bodies dancing through in fragmented bits and bytes.

In the opening series of pieces, images of traditional dancers, advertisements, famous paintings and sculptures, and other material flash up on the screens and the dancers cut and paste movements together from these digital sources. A girl kicks her foot against a wall, repeatedly. And the dancers follow suit. An African tribal ceremony shifts to a Picasso nude to an advertisement for cigarettes. The dancers seek to lose themselves—and the audience—in the gestural mix. It is not altogether unlike Merce Cunningham’s Cage-ian efforts to choreograph dance by improvisatory chance rather than controlled design. One is not surprised to learn that Hwang studied with Cunningham.

The final piece of the performance grows more intriguing when the dancers attach digital sensors to their bodies, and musician Geoff Gersh plays a large thumping pneumatic bar with his brain waves (also by digital sensor). Here the give and take between digital and flesh promises to be most “dynamically networked.” However, the results are a bit disappointing. The screens feature rather stereotypical “virtual world” imagery and the relationship between dancer movements and digital screens is predictable. The cyborg at this dance turns out to be a wallflower.

What is oddly the most compelling moment is when the dancers, musician, and technicians alike incorporate the wiring up of technology into the performance itself. The choice to lay bare the process of getting into digital gear, calibrating the equipment’s remote control capacities, and verbally announcing when the dance is about to begin (“Ready, ready, ready, go,” the call goes round) made visible the complex coordinations required in all networks. The digital, this Brechtian moment suggested, is above all else social.

It is indeed the sociality of the digital network that Koosil-ja and danceKUMIKO start to summon into heightened form. This sociality is where the flesh and the digital meet. The social body is between the buttons, on the beams, and in a digital ether whose long tail turns out to be embodied itself: it’s the foot of a young woman kicking against a wall.

#363 – Drawn To Dance

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

it figures.

Describing his efforts to draw the dancer María Muñoz, John Berger hints at the unlikely links between drawing and dance.

The effort of my corrections and the endurance of the paper have begun to resemble the resilience of María’s own body. The surface of the drawing, its skin, not its image, makes me think of how there are moments when a dancer can make your hairs stand on end. – John Berger

John Berger drawing of María Muñoz.

Both drawing and dance use visual representation to suggest forces that become—whether through fleet of foot or sleight of hand—attached to the material.

You lose your sense of time when drawing. You are so concentrated on scales of space. – John Berger

In drawing as in dance, Berger suggests, something slips through our fingers, darts past the corner of our eyes.

We who draw do so not only to make something observed visible to others but also to accompany something invisible to its incalculable destination. – John Berger

We see deeper surfaces beyond the surface, bodies within the body, glimpsing positively into negative spaces. We feel it, sense it, but then it’s gone.

Drawing María in the Bridge position was like drawing a coal miner working in a very narrow seam. – John Berger

Perhaps only through something like the repetitive technical labors of drawing and dance can we affix presence to that absence. Call them riveting art forms.

#362 – Culture Rover’s Unfamiliar Quotations

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

drawing is correcting.

At  first, you question the model…in order to discover lines, shapes, tones that you can trace on the paper. Also, of course, it accumulates corrections, after further questioning of the first answers. Drawing is correcting.

-John Berger