Archive for November, 2008

#252 – Unnaturally Natural

Tuesday, November 25th, 2008

an artist consumes nature.

The phenomena of cultural media — outdoor magazines, catalogs, and other consumer-based products — has created an ever-widening gap between opposing forces. Here, construction hinders growth, accumulation betrays worth, and success replaces integrity. This is the continuous plight that drives me. – Regin Igloria

Regin Igloria’s drawings explore the intersection of “nature” and “culture” in the Great Outdoors, Inc. His most playful and powerful works are of luxury commodities that pretend to be neither luxuries nor even commodities.

Instead, they pretend to be escapes from consumerism to “nature,” vehicles for the pure pastoral life. But Igloria’s work detects something sinister in this supposed escape. Safe-for-your-baby jogging strollers crash together as if in a ten-car pile up. A mountain bike contorts and twists around itself; seen one way, it looks like a terrible accident, seen another it starts to resemble the bird’s eye view of the never-ending circuit of freeways on which said accident occurred.

Even nature itself takes on weird associations and overlaps with the anti-environmental. For instance, Igloria titles a study of what looks to be an evergreen tree, “Study For Growth Pattern,” as if it were the blueprint plans for a new exurban subdivision.

Walking, 2008

What is refreshing about these drawings is their combination of meditative observation, wry irony, and shock value. They are not works of didactic political art meant to shock. Instead they strike a tone or mood: the conflicted emotions of a person’s  who longs for the enchantment that the commodities of the hiking store might deliver, but who also remains deeply suspicious of what these commodities claim to offer.

Commuter, Composite, Consideration, 2008

In Igloria’s drawings, the more one longs to escape into nature, to get away, the more trapped he or she becomes. The jogging strollers become virtual SUVs in a sidewalk clog. The mountain bike fragments and breaks apart into endless loops. One reaches the evergreen trees deep in the wilderness, but all they resemble is the very thing that led to their removal back in “civilization”: the street layout for a planned community of McMansions.

Study for Growth Pattern, 2008

Images: Regin Igloria/Zg Gallery

#251 – Messy Vs. Neat Backbeats

Wednesday, November 19th, 2008

there are many ways to beat the drum.

The death of Jimi Hendrix Experience drummer Mitch Mitchell left me thinking about drummers in general.

When I first heard Mitchell, I was struck by the busy quality of his drumming, the way that his beat was all aflutter on cymbal titters, rolling tom fills, and stuttering bass drum kicks. It was a tidal-wave sound, the unsteadying feel of an earthquake, full of propulsion but always verging on chaos and disruption. It was drumming as a dance with entropy, and it fit perfectly with Hendrix’s guitar playing, which was casual and messy, loose and almost laconic even as it exploded with volcanic intensity. The band’s groove barely held together, which was what made them fascinating and, paradoxically, well, to quote Hendrix himself “groovy, baby.”

R.I.P. Mitch Mitchell

Thinking about and appreciating Mitchell’s messy drumming made me get all structuralist about percussion. I began to sort drummers into two categories, a la the raw and the cooked. In this case, the binary was the messy and the neat.

On the one hand, there are drummers who celebrate the mess, who brilliantly barely keep the beat together in a flurry of percussion. I’m thinking of Mitchell, Keith Moon, and, in a whole different idiom, the jazz drummer Connie Kay, whose soft brushstrokes defined the Modern Jazz Quartet’s style and who lent such a central backdrop to albums such as Van Morrison’s Astral Weeks. It sounds like I’m putting down these drummers, but the making a mess of the groove is actually incredibly hard to accomplish — that is, to make the beat both messy and alluring all at once is no easy feat. To transform the backbeat into a beautiful mess, yet keep the groove intact may be the highest percussive achievement of all.

On the other hand, there are the neat drummers, who slice and dice the groove up into terse sections, who use silence and space as percussive elements. Here I am thinking of drummers such as Levon Helm, John Bonham, Ginger Baker, and, in the soul realm, Al Jackson Jr., with his famous delayed backbeat. These drummers reduce and refine, slim down and locate just the right access point to insert the beat. They leave you hanging on, dropping you into the silence at the heart of sound. We might call them minimalists, except they are really more accurately described as maximalists: they maximize the contribution of each percussive sound toward the song as a whole.

Messy drummers and neat drummers: I think pop music would be so much less satisfying without both approaches behind the kit.

#250 – R.I.P. John Leonard

Thursday, November 6th, 2008

no more smokin’ in the boys’ room.

When I start to read John Leonard, it is as though I, while simply looking for the men’s room, blundered into a lecture by the smartest man who ever lived.

-Kurt Vonnegut

Image: New York Times

#249 – Haunted

Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

phantom vs. ghost.

Halloween special: in the bonus features of the DVD The Story of Marie and Julien, Jacques Rivette’s 2003 film, the director insists vehemently to an interviewer that his movie is not about a phantom, but a ghost.

Jacques Rivette in The Story of Marie and Julien

Culture Rover has been haunted ever since. What is the difference? Is it something in the French terms for phantom and ghost that gets lost in translation?

Jerzy Radziwilowicz (Julien) and Emmanuelle Béart (Marie)

It is such a tantalizing distinction: are you a phantom or a ghost? But what does the distinction mean?

Images: The Story of Marie and Julien

#248 – The Presidential Race in the Country of Contradictions

Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

love and hate on the banks of the ohio.

These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.
-Barack Obama, 3/18/08

As published by Ben Smith of Politico.com (arriving to Culture Rover via Aidan Smith), two photographs from the most ambiguous region of the United States: just west of the Appalachian Mountains, but not far enough to actually be the Midwest, just north of Dixie, but not quite the North, sagging south of the Rust Belt, but as rusty as it gets, the Ohio River valley and the areas around it are a mixed and mongrel country.

Obama sign and confederate flag, Martinsville, Indiana

They are perhaps the heart of the heartland, the most American part of America, and yet they defy description. They resist the usual one-sided assumptions about where culture and politics meet.

Obama sign and black lawn jockey, Mansfield, Ohio

That it is neither here nor there may, in the end, be what makes this region the heartland. It is everywhere and nowhere: red, white, and blue (and black). A place between, a contradiction in terms, whose mixed-up betweenness, whose willingness to wear its contradictions on its lawns, is what makes it the pulsating pump powering the American civic body.

Images: Martinsville photo, Marty Kady; Mansfield photo, unnamed Obama canvasser